Delivers a fine, even mist for lightweight liquids such as toners, facial mists, hair sprays, and fragrances. Available in three fitting types to match different bottle neck designs and production requirements.
Fine mist sprayers are available in a broad range of neck sizes, colors, output volumes, and styles to suit different product needs. Buyers can choose from standard, high-viscosity, and sustainable options, along with various decoration capabilities to match brand requirements. Dip tube lengths are fully customizable, ensuring a precise fit with the bottle of your choice.
PP, PET, PE, PVC, PC, PCR (up to 100%)
PE foam, vented, pressure sensitive, foil seal, foil with paperboard backing
Smooth, ribbed, matte
SPI finishes from 18mm-53mm, custom finishes
Electroplating, color spray, metal wrap, hot stamping, silkscreen printing.
Find quick answers to common questionsabout our products, services, and capabilities.
Closure selection depends on both product characteristics (liquid, powder, viscous gel) and the container’s neck finish (thread type and size, e.g., 20-410, 24-410, 28-400). Common options include disc-top, flip-top, screw caps, dropper caps, and child-resistant closures. Always confirm neck finish compatibility with a physical fit test or CAD drawing before committing to a mold or bulk order — mismatched threads are one of the most common causes of leakage and line stoppages.
Request torque application and removal torque specifications (typically measured in inch-pounds or Newton-meters), along with leak testing under transit simulation (vibration, pressure, temperature cycling). For liquid products, an induction seal liner or foam liner is often necessary as a secondary barrier — clarify whether your supplier includes liner application in-house or as a separate process, since this affects both cost and quality consistency.
Standard stock closures typically start at MOQs of 50,000–100,000 units per color/size. Custom colors, embossed/debossed logos, or new tooling for proprietary designs usually require MOQs of 100,000–500,000+ units due to mold development costs. If your volume doesn’t justify custom tooling, ask suppliers about stock closures that can be customized with lower-cost decoration methods like hot stamping or pad printing instead.
New mold development for a custom closure typically takes 6–10 weeks, including design review, tooling fabrication, first-article sampling, and dimensional validation. Factor in additional time for functional testing (torque, seal integrity) before mass production approval. If timeline is critical, ask whether the supplier has existing mold platforms that can be modified rather than built from scratch — this can cut lead time significantly.
At minimum, request material safety data sheets (MSDS) and food-contact or cosmetic-contact compliance documentation (e.g., FDA 21 CFR, EU 10/2011) depending on your end use. For child-resistant closures, confirm compliance with applicable standards (e.g., US PPPA, ISO 8317). If sustainability claims are part of your brand positioning, request third-party certification for recycled content (PCR) or recyclability (e.g., APR Critical Guidance) rather than relying on supplier claims alone.
Request a quality control plan that includes AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) sampling standards, dimensional inspection reports, and torque testing on a defined sample size per batch. For high-volume orders, consider requesting pre-shipment inspection (PSI) by a third-party inspector, and clarify how the supplier handles out-of-spec batches (rework, replacement, or credit) before finalizing the purchase agreement.
PCR (post-consumer recycled) resin and mono-material closures (designed for easier recycling) typically carry a 5-20% cost premium over virgin plastic, depending on resin availability and color requirements. Some regions also mandate tethered closures (e.g., EU Single-Use Plastics Directive) for beverage packaging, which may require redesign rather than just a material swap — confirm regulatory requirements for your target markets early, as this affects both cost and mold design.
Closures are lightweight but bulky, so freight costs are often driven more by volume (cubic space) than weight — request cubic measurements per case/pallet to accurately estimate shipping costs. For ongoing production needs, consider establishing a rolling forecast with your supplier (e.g., 3-6 month lookahead) to reduce lead time risk, and clarify minimum reorder quantities and safety stock arrangements to avoid production line disruptions.
Tell us a bit about your information, and our team will reach out as soon as possible.
